i'm" i believe is the relevant quote. You reply to what your cognizance tells you (this is self-consciousness) as in it's miles raining out of doors so up goes the umbrella; i hold yawning so perhaps i must get a few close-eye; i hate my round the corner neighbour so i am going round the corner and shoot him. My version on the well-known quote is consequently "i reply, therefore i'm." if you assume (awareness) and if you respond (self-recognition) then it is as a substitute not going that you are giving rise to thoughts or movements which might be in Neurofy   response to illusionary stimuli. If the stimuli isn't illusionary, then your awareness of it, your awareness, isn't illusionary either. Why did awareness emerge? Although it would appear that when coming to phrases with quantum physics one desires to deal .