Education is the starting point of any human being, and humanity has come a long way to organize educational institutions of the highest class. People strive to attend colleges and universities, hoping to get the valuable knowledge and a diploma that will help them later in life. While some people believe that college and university systems are effective enough, other would disagree. Mark Edmundson and Paulo Freire present their own perspective on what education must be like. Although their opinions are similar, there are differences in interpreting students and selecting the course of action. However, the main idea is that students obtain individual and unique qualities, which must be taken into account, and in case educational system does not change, humanity will keep degrading.

One of the most important steps that Mark Edmundson writes about is changing the behavior and attitude students have towards the modern education system and its rules. He claims that students are afraid to voice their opinions, and all they do is blindly follow and learn the information that professors give them (Philosophical and Psychological Foundations of Education, n.d.). In addition, in case students are bored and concentrated on themselves, they simply do not register the information and experience that college and education in general offer. Edmundson goes as far as to call students weak, stating that “what they will not generally do, though, is indict the current system” (Edmundson, 1997). At the same time, he does not blame them since the society, school, and relatives raised them in such a way that their tries and efforts were praised too much, so they developed no personal sense of pursuit.

Paulo Freire, on the other hand, presents a case for students in which they should be the main element of the system. For Freire, students have a rich and profound world inside their regular exterior, and teachers and students must collaborate so that to determine a personally adjusted educational system together. Students already possess large quantities of knowledge, and teachers so they very often ask for help form various best writing services, more specifically college professors, must be there to help each student to understand that knowledge and apply it with a purpose to own pursuits (Irwin, 2012). Freire’s kindness can be seen in his whole explanation of the theories that are proposed, especially when he states that students must be treated as true teachers (Darder, 2017). Knowledge and learning are extremely individual; thus, students must compose a significant part of the education process and guide teachers according to personal wants and needs.

Both Paulo Freire and Mark Edmundson admit the importance of the student as a key figure in the learning process. However, it seems Freire places greater attention on the individual world of each person and the perspective students can create for their professors. In turn, Edmundson focuses on the professor as a guiding mechanism that must teach students what to want and how to demand it (Edmundson, 2013). However, both authors do not consider the limitations of the system. If every students’ individual life, experiences, and environmental conditions are taken into account and adjusted to, it would take much time and effort as well as staff to deal with each student. Overall, the lack of individuality in education does exist and must be fixed.

In conclusion, education is a much-needed part of life that brings up new generations. The educational system is slowly changing to take into account students’ wants and needs; however, the process is still one sided. Professors and teachers select the materials, and students follow them. In particular, Freire and Edmundson advocate that students must play a greater role as learners and educators in order to avoid stagnation of education.